Twitter | Tumblr | Flavours | Robo.to

Nicole Seah - Education: CHIJ Katong, VJC, Bachelor of Social Science in NUS.

Pros: Knows how to insult PAP to ginormous cheers

Cons: Attention-seeking whore with grumpy face

GURLLL .
IN WHAT WAY IS NICOLE SEAH A WHORE ?

DEFINITION OF A WHORE:a woman who engages in promiscuous sexual intercourse, usually for money; prostitute; harlot; strumpet.

LIKE WHAT TH EFF O.O
NICOLE SEAH DID NOTHING WRONG OKAY .
AND WHAT SHE SAYS ARE JUST MERELY STATING TH FACTS .
PAP ALSO SAY BAD THINGS ABOUT OPPOSITION RIGHT ?
THIS IS TH REALITY PAL
ELECTIONS ARE LIKE THIS .
WHAT GIVES HER TH BIG ASS RIGHT TO SAY THAT TO NICOLE SEAH ?
SHE AINT ANY BODY MANXZ.

YO GURL .,
NICOLE SEAH HAS TH SWAG OKAY .

SWAG.
AND WELL , TIN PEI LING IS JUST , AIRHEAD ?
she’s never left the country and has no life experience of note outside of Singapore.
they way she speaks is just .... -.-

a transcript of a speech given by Tin Pei Ling in 2007. It was a speech titled Globalisation – High & Low and here was something that I could gain some insight on – especially since she’s been lauded as a great orator. Working as a scriptwriter and having debated on a national level I take rhetoric rather seriously and here’s what I learnt from her speech.

She began with, “Besides studying whether the gap is widening, it is more important to find out if the lowest-income group is able to get by and not fall into the vicious cycle.”

Okay… good, some worthwhile information. Except that it wasn’t. That’s all she said on the subject. Apparently as important as it was to “find out if the lowest-income group is able to get by”, no effort worth mentioning was made to do it, since she immediately followed with, “Many people are complaining and blaming the government for this problem. But is this really the responsibility of the government? I don’t think so.”

“Singapore’s income gap is growing. The Gini coefficient for Singapore had increased from 0.442 to 0.472 in year 2000, before adjusting for Government benefits and taxes. From an economic standpoint, this suggests a growing income inequality.”

Great… sounds like a lead up to addressing the issue, doesn’t it? “This widening of income gap is a complex challenge faced by every society. And to tackle this, it helps to break it down and address the components accordingly.”

Nice, a breakdown of the components… and they are? “To address the rich-poor gap, we must first ascertain the possibility of becoming rich in the first place!”

the ending of what this guy wrote is

Judging from the attitude of some of these humble background candidates it seems to be that they have forgotten that they are exceptions to the norm – not representatives of it – and that their stance of “I am just like you, so I know how you feel” is hypocritical at best. I say to them – It’s quite clear that you are no longer like us. You are now in the top 5%. And it’s obvious that you think like the top 5%. And it’s also obvious that you don’t even realise it. Saying that everyone can be in the top 5% if they tried is a ridiculous affront to mathematics. But nevermind that, sell it to the plebs. Inspire them to work harder, sell them the idea that they can be rich while you get richer and they stagnate (decline, actually, once you factor in inflation), sell them the concept of helping them to help themselves, while you help yourselves – to an additional S$15,000 a month.

and i completely agree with him .

SERIOUSLY XIAXUE ,


DUN SAY ME OKAY .